For millennia, the human experience has existed within tribal groups. Only recently has a tribal mindset become something that is taboo or even for some ethnic groups, immoral. And who decided that it was immoral and at what point in history did it become that way? It seems that, in modern society, it is perfectly fine for some groups to have collective agency while it is forbidden for others.

Let us first examine, within our own moral framework, if having an in-group preference violates our beliefs. As Southerners we are Christian. It is this Christian moral framework, along with our  Northern European genetics, English language, and shared geographic history, that defines our ethnicity. So it follows, that if having an in group preference is inherently anti-Christian, then it would also be objectively amoral, given the fact that Christianity is the means by which the Southern Man accesses Objective Morality.

When I mention that small groups of like kindred make for the best religious congregations, I usually get shot the same Bible verses or partial verses as a counter to my argument. Before I make the point that these people are intentionally, or unintentionally, misusing Bible verses to add cover for an anti-Christian, secular worldview, we will look at a couple of the most popular ones, in context, to see if they indeed show us to be living short of the moral standards we have chosen to follow.

There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus 

Galatians 3:28

For some reason it is this verse that I see most used to justify the destruction of kindred congregations. It takes such a small brain to read this and think that Paul is teaching us that there are no ethnicities, while he is specifically addressing one. And are we to think that the Bible is teaching us that there are no males or females? Of course not, and even with it being ripped from its context it does nothing to counter the fact that the Bible does not forbid freedom of association.

Even them will I bring to my holy mountain, and make them joyful in my house of prayer: their burnt offerings and their sacrifices shall be accepted upon mine altar; for mine house shall be called a house of prayer for all people.

Isaiah 56:3

This one was shot at me by a member of the New Independent Fundamental Baptist movement after I asked if the Bible had any prohibition against independant, ethnically akin congregations. This is the movement headlined by Pastor Steven Anderson who is finding himself in the ADL’s cross-hairs after taking on the sexual degeneracy that is plaguing the modern Christian church. Pastor Anderson and the rest of the NIFB, despite all of their good work elsewhere, seem to have bought in completely with the globalist attempt to break apart kindred communities, especially ethnically homogeneous, Christian congregations.

The verse is not even an answer to the question that I proposed. It is referring to making sacrifices at the temple during the Old Testament period. Christians do not make sacrifices at any physical temple and we never will. 

As we can see, there is no prohibition in the Bible against preferring to worship the Lord within the company and safety of one’s own kin. As a matter of fact, this has been the norm for ages up until the 1960’s. If it is such a “grave and immoral sin that goes against the Bible and all we believe,” would someone not have already pointed out the inconsistency? It is not like there has been a shortage of enemies to the Christian faith over the past couple of hundred years. Why is it now that this has become such an intolerable position to take?

Upon further examination, we see that it is not the Bible who is setting this prohibition, but some other source outside of our community. What is taking place is a replacement of our biblical moral framework by a secular one. This replacement has been so slow and steady, that people within our community have come to believe that it is integral to our worldview. That is why these scriptures are ripped from there context and misconstrued so terribly.

 For the most part, these people are not anti-Christian, especially the younger ones. They truly believe that the false, secular moral values that they have been given are objective in their value. They then comb the scriptures looking for validation to the morals they already hold. It is our job to show them that they are “doing the thing backwards.”

Relevance has become a word that is heard more and more often in Christian circles as well as in the southern community. The thought behind it being that, if we are going to have influence on the multi-ethnic society we live in, then our worldview must have relevance within that culture. Our adversaries use the relevance argument to target those of us who are afraid of being called backward or un-hip. This is a deceitful narrative that is designed to have our community completely removed from any influence on the culture at large, by having us accept whatever moral standards that the solicitors of pop-culture deem as acceptable as our own. It is no accident that these replacement morals have a negative effect on our people.

This loosening of one’s morals in order to accommodate an outsider who refuses to bend theirs, is a character trait often seen in people of northern European ancestry. One only needs to look at the British Isles and Scandinavia to see its destructiveness in action. Unfortunately, we Southerners share this trait to a good degree. It works as a way of climbing the social ladder by showing how much more kind and caring you are in comparison to others who surround you. However, when those intransigent minorities who have infiltrated your barriers and who would also benefit from the destruction of your community become aware of this trait, they begin to use it against your kindred. It is then that it must be exposed as a weakness and shamed as traitorous to those who practice it.

As Southerners, we are already outsiders from the popular culture. As Christian Southerners even more so. Now is not the time to be bending our morals in order to accommodate people who hate us. History has shown that it is next to impossible to destroy a culture that does not voluntarily work to destroy itself. Let us not make our adversary’s job easy for them.

 Persecution is indeed headed our way. We must double down on our moral standards and banish the world’s replacement morality from our congregations. Our future depends on it.